Sunday, May 13, 2007

“No stone left unturned” is a phrase often used to describe the quality of thoroughness related to a task (usually something the police say in a murder inquiry!). It does not literally mean that stones were turned in the process. Stone turning is a major facet of geophysical survey on El Cabo however. I sincerely doubt there is a stone, or a log, or a coconut husk which has not been turned, or kicked, or flicked at least once on the entire site. In fact the daily movement of debris from one survey square to the next, and back again is major task. After a while, you come to recognize certain items which you have, more than once, shifted out of the way of the radar or magnetometer. There is a difference between moving a stone for the 1st time, and shifting it for the nth time; the difference is in the number and variety of species which it houses – ants, spiders, crabs (Belto found a hermit crab in a toothpaste tube cap today), scorpions (not poisonous mum), artefacts, damp, rubbish.

Talking of rubbish (a favourite archaeological pastime) - major rubbish classes encountered in El Cabo are: empty drinks cartons (milk or water), barbed wire, empty liquor bottles (probably mostly rum), old shoes, vehicle parts, old archaeological pins from our previous work, various coloured pieces of plastic, fishing floats and fishing nets and multicoloured pieces of string. This is not to say that the site is cluttered with litter, in fact, as a communal village area, it is remarkably clean. Cleaner in fact of modern non-degradables than of pre-Columbian rubbish, which is everywhere! Smashed and crumbled ceramic vessels, old stone tools (mainly axes and adzes), coral and stone pieces of pestle and mortar, polishing pebbles, food remains (fish bones and shell), all piled in visible heaps. Although to be fair, whereas the current village has existed for about 25 years (I think), the pre-Columbian inhabitants were in the same spot, on and off, for 700 years or so. Enough time to make a bit of a mess.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

how big is this site actually? sounds like the size of a lot of ball courts (figuratively speaking in the sense of football pitches, i hope).

1:44 AM  
Blogger alice said...

well, we surveyed and augered an area over about 4ha., but actually, there are "blind" spots, which we are surveying now and are more aware of now, so I would say 5-6ha. Don't know how many football pitches that is! (do you?!). as for ball courts, yes, that is what I'd love to identify with the geophys, and pathways, and feature concentrations, and garden areas. the Dominican literature is full of 'we found a ball court/plaza here and 3 over there', but on el cabo, possibly due to the long occupation, but also maybe due to the fact that not all large sites (and judging by the literature Cabo is relatively medium-large) actuall had plazas...we do have cereminial belt fragments however, which have always been linked to ball courts. plaza=empty area in arcaheological terms, somestines with dfemarcated banks/stones. whether we have this or not is not clear yet.

5:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work.

3:59 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home